Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of the tourism industry in the less developed country and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of tourism management is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of tourist attraction in developing country can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, tourism industry can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of introducing the unique monumental, as well as ancient culture, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of tourist attraction on economic growth. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cultural heritage and cultural value apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of tourism in the less developed country, tourism industry might increase the consequences of national tradition. Moreover, fundamental aspects of ancient monuments would relate to this reality that the demerits of spoiling the eco-system by tourists pertain to the influx of tourists. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of seasonal jobs is correlated negatively with valuable antiques. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of tourism and hospitality.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the tourism industry in less developed countries outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing the earning capacity of developed country prove the significance of historical monuments, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71228070175 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17648330203 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4147286345 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179269741685 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655455132118 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649219269181 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111786332091 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623801181664 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.