Some people suggest that each family should only have a car and encourage alternative vehicle. Do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of the suggestion that each family should only have a car and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that encouraging to the alternative vehicle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that this recommendation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support that each family should only have a car. At first sight, having a personal car for family members is beneficial to travel fast. However, the result is crowded streets and heavy traffic on highways. For example, many people in big cities such as Tehran and London are wasting their times in heavy traffics every day because they do not like to use public vehicles.
In addition, since the invention of car people's living became easier due to its advantages. But the cars are very harmful to the environment. The people spew tones of carbon dioxide in the air by their cars that is very influential on global warming. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by Tehran University researchers in 2016 has shown that a significant number of air pollution gasses outing of cars' exhaust that they have a substantial effect on climate changing.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this suggestion, I profoundly believe that there are many benefits with traveling by public vehicles instead of the personal car that its drawbacks are far outweighed its conveniences.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey do not like to use public vehicles. In addition, since the invention of car ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubstantial effect on climate changing. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16153846154 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91434678097 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603846153846 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5432887396 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266485558017 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951490136658 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955722172612 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140648777816 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762033321965 0.0609392437508 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.