The importance of spending more money on protecting endangered species, was always debatable, has now become more controversial. It is agreed strongly upon the fact that this has some convincing arguments despite the contentions about it. This essay will discuss how protecting endangered species is necessary and how this is a wasting of money and will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why allocating more money on protection of endangered species has some negative aspects, but the alarming one lies on the fact that some of these species help to protect the balance of nature. For an instance, a study recently done has concluded that after some years from the time some species have extinct, human also have the risk of extinction. For the reason, affect of allocating small money on protecting extinction animals should not be ignored.
Nevertheless, some people tend to believe that reducing allocating money on protecting endangered species has some positive facets as well. However, the most predominant one stems from the fact that this money can be allocated on the betterment of people suffering from hunger or war. As an illustration, a recent study has shown that 60% of people and 45% of people are suffering from hunger or war in the world. Therefore, the importance of allocating more money on protecting these people not the extinction animals, is not only beneficial but also necessary.
After analyzing the discussion it can be concluded that allocating money on protecting endangered animal life is waste, is significant, although the given human race is also at risk due to the extinction of these endangered species, should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16967509025 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8796130205 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487364620939 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2558461795 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.181818182 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339730302694 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145325078111 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700608454907 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217355029286 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295774552147 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.