some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Advertising is increasingly entering more and more personal areas of our
lives. While public schools may benefit from additional revenue from
advertising, there are negative implications that should be taken into
consideration. This essay will discuss why advertising in schools should not
be used a form of revenue generation.
There are various reasons why public schools might use advertising to
generate more revenues. For example, a school might be poor and
advertising might be the only option to make additional revenue. Many
schools in poor areas do in fact use advertising to bolster their budgets.
While advertising might be an easy option for schools to make money, they
may want to consider other options.
There are various reasons why public schools should not use advertising to
make more money. Academic integrity may be compromised by
advertising in the school and as a result children may be exploited. It is well
known that companies often target children in advertising campaigns that
may not be ethical. The effect that advertising might have on children at
schools may have negative consequences.
This essay discussed the reasons why schools may or may not use
advertising to increase revenues. In my opinion, schools should refrain from
advertising because academic integrity should be more important than
making additional money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, well, while, for example, in fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 6.10837438424 311% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59154929577 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90077784599 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 139.433497537 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483568075117 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2199969829 50.4703680194 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6153846154 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.12807881773 509% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206678232922 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985165430936 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333434023239 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793602999978 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499766421012 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.