Recently, the phenomenon of attracting and selecting students according to their academic abilities by schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that having students with different abilities together at schools cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that separating students can be negative, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss separating schools to different missions. At first, working on intelligent students can introduce best talents to the scientific organizations. However, discrimination in training could have many disadvantages. For example, separating students by their academic abilities may causing to lose hidden talents.
In addition, studying students with different academic levels could motivate students with lower academic rates. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of schools in new education systems opt students in different levels in order to discover and grow new talents to serve the society.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that the benefits of gathering students with diverse abilities in schools far outweighed its drawbacks. Not only for the mental reasons, but also for a fair education system.
- "“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples 55
- some people believe that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can le 77
- In the 18 century due to industrialization a lot of people migrated to developed countries. this affected lifestyle and increased major problems in developed countries. Discuss the problems and solutions. 77
- Do you think that the English Language will continue to remain as the global language despite globalization? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of attracting a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'introduce the best'.
Suggestion: introduce the best
...st, working on intelligent students can introduce best talents to the scientific organizations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: losing
...by their academic abilities may causing to lose hidden talents. In addition, stud...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es may causing to lose hidden talents. In addition, studying students with diff...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grow new talents to serve the society. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78475336323 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09558036375 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605381165919 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2639594482 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332807655085 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121019589115 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784089083234 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196113023969 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501895473315 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.