Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of fulltime employment and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of hard working is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that efficient management of working hours can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, high-paid careers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of the job satisfaction, as well as the intriguing working environment, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the long time engagement and success. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both fulltime jobs and salient facts of work apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science boring jobs might increase the consequence of non-achievement hard working. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional working methods would relate to this reality that the demerits of unskilled workers pertain massive lose. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of working hours is correlated negatively with unpleasant results. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of bad work systems.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of successful jobs far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of working place prove the significance of free time, but also pinpoint long- term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Deepkaur123 | 72 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree? 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 80
- Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57633587786 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19197403045 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667938931298 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0933981364 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154293542876 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497224691487 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305786541397 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869165409049 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189678463894 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.