Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views.
The importance of work for long hours and give importance for free time which was debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that some people work for long hours to achieve success because they have passion lot for profession. For instance, doctor profession is very hard they gives lot of time for duty. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that as well as teacher job is very hard. They teach children with long period. Some people wants to achieve a big goal in life so they work harder and harder. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effect is that some people give importance to free time because they want to spend the time with family and also they can give importance to their hobbies. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of people work for long period and some importance to free time are indeed too great.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...ce, doctor profession is very hard they gives lot of time for duty. Another pivotal a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83271375465 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46932508363 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2122282633 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390907626233 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123954828899 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117307384856 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248974837969 0.151781067708 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388062804597 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.