Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education? agree or disagree?

Submitted by Mpaul on Wed, 08/21/2019 - 03:33

Nowadays, considerable number of people are inclined towards experimental learning as compared to conventional method of formal education, which has attracted myriads of controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be agreed that students can reap more benefits through experimental learning, while on the other hand stands a perspective that gives detrimental effects to non-experienced educated people. This essay will elucidate on both sides and thus will lead to a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons why experimental learning is more advantageous in formal education and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it allows students to understand and grasp ideas in a more detailed manner. For example, a student will better understand the ideas of physics and mathematics through experimental elaborations but not from theoretical knowledge. Moreover, it helps in developing cognitive skills in students. In a fast evolving life developing strong formal education base has become necessity. Hence, there is no reason to why one should not adhere experience during formal learning.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks for the detrimental effects to non-experienced educated. It demotivates students at their crucial time of career which also brings stress in youngsters. As an illustration, being in competitive job market, non-experienced students have less weight-age as compare to experienced ones. A recent survey shows 30% students get their job because of their experience in formal studies. Because of this, non-experienced students face challenge in competitive job market that causes serious problem to society.
In light of discussion above, it can be concluded that experimental learning has countless benefits towards job security which is prominent , although that way it effects non-experienced educated students should not be overlooked.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to while'
Suggestion: to while
... benefits through experimental learning while on the other hand stands a perspective ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...nclusion. At the outset, there are a myriad of reasons why experimental learning is...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...matics through experimental elaborations instead of restricting to theoretical kn...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...perienced ones. As per recent survey 30% students get their job because of their ...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... towards job security which is prominent , although that way it effects non-experi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66788321168 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27735833957 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5310337154 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201121734267 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639039666312 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723414197133 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131073631334 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075132986344 0.0609392437508 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.