The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Recently, in many countries around the whole world, but it has become an extremely controversial issue that Government should money spend on space travel rather than environmental issue because both are mandatory for mankind. Therefore, Government should allocate equal resources to both. This must be stopped and proper solutions should be applied. Therefore, for the discussion to some problems and suggest some possible solutions.
To begin with, obviously, a great deal of ways to cause and Space travel is the responsibility of government for the welfare of people on earth because when the research would be done then it would be aids to humankind. Such as scientist’s would find out the treatment of incurable disease and can save the many precious life by person doctors or specialists. Moreover, natural resources that are going to scare on the earth can found on other planet. These resources such as fossil fuels, minerals and waters are most important for living on earth.
On the other hand, although, space travel would have some fruitful results but the problems of poverty, unemployment, terrorism and pollution has becoming a leading concern on earth. Therefore, government should expenditure on these problems first people in the rural area are not much awaking about environmental problems and the awareness must be driven in those areas by organize campaign.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that spending too much money on research of mars and moons is worthless in front of these problems because government should solve the fundamental problems of mankind first after that they should think about the other planet and there should be balance between both.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to humankind. Such as scientist's would find out the treatment of incurabl...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Therefore, government should expenditure on these problems first people in the ru...
^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h money on research of mars and moons is worthless in front of these problems bec...
^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'balanced'?
Suggestion: balanced
...ut the other planet and there should be balance between both.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28252788104 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7892587448 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57249070632 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3399313857 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.181818182 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304265945614 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102074214129 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738619231487 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187366791619 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438776447673 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.