Traveling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
Recently, we have witnessed phenomena of traveling to at distance places for tertiary education. Proponents are debating this development, many experts are inclined towards traveling due to its benefits, others have opposite view stating that most of the brilliant scholars are born out of studying locally. In this article, I will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of traveling for studies before deriving a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, there are paramount benefits of traveling for tertiary studies, first, by following this trend, students can enroll for in the area of their academic interest, due to lack of institutions not available domestically. For instance, The MIT university of USA provides best and rarest education in the area of information technology, students from the world over travel there due to its specialization, excellent teachers and state of art infrastructure. Absent of such institutions intrigue students to travel abroad. Moreover, by traveling for study, a student can learn a great deal about local society and culture. This has proven to provide many brilliant scholars.
On the other hand, there is a negligible downside of this trend, it is exorbitantly costly and there are threats that students can get influence by local free culture thus get trapped in bad habits. Hence, utter care should be taken.
In conclusion, from the above example, it is evident that although there is a minor downside of studying abroad, it can be boon for the student in the steam of specialization.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, moreover, really, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38783269962 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0174115346 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589353612167 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1379023943 50.4703680194 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461882794045 0.242375264174 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187229699005 0.0925447433944 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15594624935 0.071462118173 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28661389621 0.151781067708 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.24502962675 0.0609392437508 402% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.