Medical technology can increase humans life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse?
The life expectancy of people has been increased due to the development of medical science which sparked a heated argument among certain groups of individuals. Many people consider this as an achievement of technology. Others reject this notion and don't see this as a positive development. This essay will elaborate on the positive side of the medical field which is becoming a boon. To start with, there is no doubt that development in the medical field has increased the life expectancy of people. A recent data shows that the average death of a person has increased from 50 percent in 1990 to 70 percent in 2019. Consequently, early deaths are decreased. Secondly, there are many benefits to the improvement in life expectancy, humans are making health-related decisions and this achievement can be attributed to improvement in public health and medical care. For example, new inventions in the medical field had found solutions to many dreadful diseases such as cancer, HIV and many. As a result, life expectancy has been increased during these years. From above, the advancements in medical technology creates advantages for future life. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that an increase in the average life expectancy rate can help people to live a healthy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2022-12-21 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 77 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | Bipin kandel | 55 | view |
- Medical technology can increase humans life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 33
- successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters agree disagree 72
- Medical technology can increase humans life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 55
- for a successful company selling products depends more on company s reputation or it depends more on provide discount and free offers 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...chnology. Others reject this notion and dont see this as a positive development. Thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, for example, no doubt, such as, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 209.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08133971292 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91146654448 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0084430031 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365440890475 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121194525095 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103938425349 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365440890475 0.151781067708 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.