Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Prominent people are determination and intimation for upcoming generation, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. While some people think that famous people are suitable to be a role model for youngsters, others believe that pupils should follow their own passion and dreams rather than intimate someone. I am not completely disagreed with the above mention question, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
To begin with, youngsters are naturally inclined to a specific attitude, which means they will gain prosperity by learning from their superiors. This seems reasonable, because it is crucial in the current era to follow someone footsteps to be successful. For instance, an organization with popular sport stars has the ability to train and teach someone to gain prosperity in the field of sports. Thus, motivation and dogged determination is a key factor, which can be achieved by looking at the example of other famous people.
From a social standpoint, people have passion and innovative ideas, which are worth exploring. They are learning and observing glamorous film stars or sport stars, but their goal is completely opposite. As a tangible example, a research conducted by a prestigious university has asserted that human have the potential to gain wealth without the need of supervision. According to my own experience, when I was studying at university, I found that students who followed a role model have less success rate than others.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that a role model does not matter that much if people are motivated enough to follow their own passion and dreams.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27636363636 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87887948818 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5880603323 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.916666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181932984846 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581818735052 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692289473589 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964982353623 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388532540902 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.