Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
Employees suggestions are not crucial for a prominent company, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. While some people think that company employees ideas are very crucial for a company to gain prosperity, others maintain that high level authorities have better skills and ability to make critical decisions than their inferiors. I am inclined to believe that everyone ideas can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
To begin with, success depends on the performance of employees, and it is hard to speculate the struggle and challenges they faced on daily basis. These employees are the key ingredient to success, because they are dogged determined to make their life better. For instance, researchers conducted a social experiment, which proved those companies who listened to their employees have higher success rates than their counterparts. Therefore, under no condition companies should only listen to their superiors.
From a social standpoint, there is not turmoil that leaders are more experienced and have mental agility, but other people should not be underestimated. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that to solve complex issues wit matters the most. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I observed in many sophisticated situations a low rank employee has creative and better solution than a supreme leader. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly suggest that the benefits of giving chance to everyone is valuable. Not only do the advantages of this unique event prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46527777778 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04758271695 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642361111111 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.968688439 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162375364066 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483355626281 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466922817438 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827645039203 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560352518304 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.