Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting event such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and antisocial behaviors. If team sports lead to antisocial behavior, are team sports good for us?
Team sports always flourish physical fitness and inculcate high characteristics values in an individual. Some people think that team sports such as soccer might entail voilence as well as antisocial behaviour, while others maintain that they hold a high value in shaping of character. This essay will discuss the extreme postive aspects of team sports on an individual.
Firstly, there are myriad of arguments to support the making of character and physical fitness by team sports. Team sports provides an exposure to interact with sportsmen of different tempraments and moods and assists an individual to learn high character values by maintaing a firm stance in the sports ground. As an example, a team trying to score a goal in a football match works collectively boosting teamwork and overcoming personal shortcomings, therefore, such lessons taught are beyond any meaning and not only shape an individual's character but also boosts his physical fitness.
On the other hand, a group of people supports the argument that matches played between rivals might turn into battle fields and result in various antisocial behaviours. These people are totally unaware of the true meaning of sportsman ship which motivates a team and keeps them bound to the ethics and values of the sports field. For instance, in a match is between rivals, losing team will always hold their nerves and this will not only make them learn high characteristic values but also depict a better image of the team. Therefore, there exists no reason that sports matches played between rivals might get accompanied by voilence.
To conculde, aforementioned provide plausibe support in favour of my argument and in my opinion, undoubtedly, team sports inculcate high character values followed by better physical and mental fitness.
- Human values are losing because of wealth-producing careers such as medicine? Do you agree or disagree? 55
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 70
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 77
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 55
- a groupe of people like to spend money rather save it why they do this what are the avantages and disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...eyond any meaning and not only shape an individuals character but also boosts his physical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of the true meaning of sportsman ship which motivates a team and keeps them bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3031358885 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73281816282 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550522648084 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9382873567 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.363636364 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4545454545 7.25397266985 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319466354872 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136040691967 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415179783589 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197440662642 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653730136083 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.