technological access to online music should be free or paid
The importance of technological access to online music should be free or paid which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to be a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that provide help to struggling singers and composes, so that they learn myriad thing from new technology. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that poor individuals can also have access to music. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that it reduces market value and popularity of a composed music. Besides, it decreases motivation of singers. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21224489796 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80485685746 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587755102041 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.5299384816 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321448584143 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110494315305 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164114524169 0.071462118173 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215656671808 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19221476255 0.0609392437508 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.