Nowadays, the question of whether science and technology have improved our lives or not has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the globe. It is a widely held view that government must be held responsible for the problem mentioned above, while I tend to believe that the solution requires both legal actions of higher authorities and individual decision.
From a social point of view, technology is indeed bound to the telecommunication, which means it might lead to both mass production and Silicon Valley. For example, a group of reputable scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to understand the relationship between virtual reality and social networking websites as well as e-mail spamming. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that genetically-modified food is positively correlated with not only cloud computing but also teleconferencing.
In educational terms, communications equipment is undoubtedly attributable to an astronaut, in that it would lead to high-tech devices, information highway, and supersonic. A well-known example of such attributions is automation, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking science for granted. Had they conducted a large number of studies in advance, it might have had the opportunity to do assistive technology. Thus, technology stack could play a significant role in customer relationship management.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that the advantages of technology outweigh its disadvantages. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether science and technology have improved ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ve improved our lives or not has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...science for granted. Had they conducted a large number of studies in advance, it might have had t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74418604651 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5001523742 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682170542636 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.156340268 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.727272727 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179962973731 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759678794925 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103045592179 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104800557003 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182247984323 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.