Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. Given time, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument.
In today’s world, the use of technology is ever-increasing. Even in classrooms technology can be commonly seen. It is disagreed that technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyzing both the inability of a technology-driven teacher to discipline students in a classroom as well as this robotic teacher’s hindrance to a student’s learning process will show this.
Firstly, a teacher powered by artificial intelligence would have little to no control over its students. For example, it is commonly understood that children require the watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that they are indeed completing their class work and not fooling around during class time. Unfortunately, this is something that a robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear why technology will never completely replace the teacher in the classroom.
However, on the other side of this argument, it must be remembered that a teacher powered by artificial intelligence would have little to no control over its students. For example, it is commonly understood that children require the watchful eye of a teacher to ensure that they are indeed completing their class work and not fooling around during class time. Unfortunately, this is something that a robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear why the argument that technology will never completely replace the teacher in the classroom could also be plausible.
In summary, both sides of the argument regarding the possibility of a technologically driven classroom have strong support. However, after analyzing both camps it is clear that the idea of having a class run entirely by a machine cannot be supported. As such, it is predicted that the negative aspects of the debate over computerized teaching will forever be stronger than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...r to discipline students in a classroom as well as this robotic teacher's hindrance t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear why technology will...
^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... robotic teacher simply cannot provide. Thus this makes it clear why the argument th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r than the positive ones and because of this computers will never replace teachers.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3853820598 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10827127455 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.580463131201 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2310218446 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.066666667 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431508467207 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170968881402 0.0925447433944 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118216428098 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293446281607 0.151781067708 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846043564334 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.