A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The proportion of people who are biased against abusing animals to further humankind’s causes is dramatically increasing. However, there is still a sliver of people who are of the view that we can make use of animals so as to meet our demands. This essay tries to discuss both sides of this argument before arriving at a rational conclusion.
On the one hand, there are some commentators who subscribe to the idea that there are no other options left for the humankind but using animals to address a wide range of our issues. Otherwise, we will be highly likely to confront several predicaments. They often argue that humankind’s impulse to consume meat is an innate human feature, and it does not seem sensible to suppress this inherent tendency. Moreover, there are not sufficient vegan foods in our grasp; thus, consuming meat is of the essence to feed the vast majority of people across the world. The other reason that the outspoken advocates of using animals usually point out is scientific aims. There are numerous medicines, ranging from simple antibiotics to advanced methods for curing cancers, that cannot be prescribed for individuals since might exert some unforeseen detrimental impacts on the human; hence, researchers should test these medicines on animals in advance in order to minimize any plausible further damage.
There is no denying that what supporters of using animals allege sounds logical to an extent; however, a sizeable number of people, including me, are by no means convinced that exploiting animals in order to fulfil human-being’s needs is righteous. Quite the opposite, it is an inhumane approach to misuse other creatures without considering the level of atrocity we are committing against them. Animal activists firmly believe that every species has equal right to live, and no one should be allowed to kill any kind of species for personal purposes. The conventional belief that humanity is a carnivorous species is also strongly rejected by animal activists. They believe that individuals should intensify their efforts to alter their current eating plan and turn to vegan diets. From their point of view, no excuses even medical researchers can justify the level of pain we are imposing to animals. Scientists are usually blamed that they are not determined enough to figure out an adequate substitute for animals in laboratories.
By way of conclusion, both sides to this argument bring some reasonable claims, however, I personally believe that we have already caused various irreversible damages to animals; thus, it seems to a matter of urgency to halt this procedure. Otherwise, we will have faced a paradise lost in less than a decade.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...he view that we can make use of animals so as to meet our demands. This essay tries to d...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.5418719212 237% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 31.9359605911 207% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 1207.87684729 188% => OK
No of words: 437.0 242.827586207 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20366132723 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 3.92707691288 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8614606773 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 139.433497537 179% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572082379863 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 379.143842365 195% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1758305577 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 2.75862068966 399% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298105730713 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798498246298 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045869082984 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153472031715 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809388200903 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 55.0591133005 242% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.