In today's era, TV has become very important part of life as a medium to spread intelligence and social awareness. Do you think it could have other side as well?
In recent days, televisions mostly smart ones are becoming part of our life. It is apparently used to spread news and information to public. Apart from this, I think television can be used for education and gamings. The following paragraphs will explain these sides.
First, television can be used in teaching students. Because of mobiles and other handheld devices, children prefer to use digital screens. There are many educational materials found in digital form because of the digital shift happening in present days around the world. For example, we can find anything on search engines like google and even encyclopedia is online now. So, using one of these smart TVs, teachings can be carried out in more interesting way. Therefore, TV can play a good role in education sector.
Second, gamers are using TV screens as big screen to play games. Games are being more popular these days and advancement on gaming technology has made it possible to display fine images and videos on TV that gives real experience with virtual reality 3D-glasses. This is another dimension where big screen is supporting gaming arena to flourish.
To conclude, there are other areas such as teaching and gaming where TVs can play a crucial role along with the traditional use to deliver messages and information to mass.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n play a good role in education sector. Second, gamers are using TV screens as b...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...crucial role along with the traditional use to deliver messages and information to ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, second, so, therefore, apart from, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60326836358 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2517547125 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4285714286 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0650995408002 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025023788223 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302148634979 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0433516073394 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313329236926 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.