Tourism in underdeveloped countries.
The importance of tourism in under developed countries which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which I will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that when tourism are come in under developed countries the economic growth will be grow of that country. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that mostly from developed countries people are come to under developed country. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that tourist are promoting western culture and eventually diminishing their original culture. For instance, British tradition has affected Indian culture several in the present modern era. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of tourist are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, it is potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... of reason which I will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fact that when tourism are come in under developed countries the economic growth ...
^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37662337662 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72446773915 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.642910779 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.909090909 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0348893121361 0.242375264174 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0116707276561 0.0925447433944 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247953178545 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0191840893406 0.151781067708 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191880615161 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.