Is Toursim Good Or Bad For The Countries? Agree Or Disagree

Essay topics:

Is Toursim Good Or Bad For The Countries? Agree Or Disagree

The most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number tourist which helps to aid the economic sector of country. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and should be rejected.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one is that tourism brings various job opportunities. In fact, Not only can people uplift their living standard but it can also help to maintain environment sustainability. We can find overwhelming evidence that tourism brings positive change. Needles to say, all the merits stand public in good stead as far as developing is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this is that it will also help government to develop the entire infrastructure for all the better economy sources. Besides, tourists came to see natural beauty it also became core purpose to conserve the environment. For example, tourists like natural beauty so it forces to make the natural thing in original position. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of tourism.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of tourism are indeed too great to ignore so, tourism is good for the countries.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-03-18 uzamak 11 view
2018-03-18 uzamak 11 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...urists like natural beauty so it forces to make the natural thing in original position....
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, for example, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9765258216 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81362093804 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0495795284 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3333333333 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0676885921858 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215366896541 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321542948189 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431918387095 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349004631513 0.0609392437508 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.