In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, a substantial number of huge shopping malls are significantly increasing in cities and towns. This growing trend of malls can produce economic benefits and numerous jobs for the people living in these areas. Therefore, I strongly agree that shopping malls in towns and cities can be a total replacement for small-scale local stores.
Shopping malls generate primary sources of economic growth through products sales. For instance, people are always inclined to visit the malls to buy expensive items, personal needs, and home necessities. Additionally, big shopping malls have unlimited products compared to small local markets. Hence, the malls that are established in cities and towns are of vital importance and highly to achieve the significant improvement of the economy.
Similarly, developing big shopping malls in cities and towns can greatly increase vast numbers of jobs in the wider community. As a prime example, the recent evidence indicates that shopping malls produced a large percentage of employment in construction works and department stores. Moreover, the vast majority of people dramatically increased their chance to get decent jobs in huge malls compared to local supermarkets and shops. Therefore, this positive effect of large shopping malls is clear evidence to replace the small local shops.
To conclude, big shopping malls in towns and cities have more beneficial effects and are of paramount importance compared to small local shops. Thus, in my opinion, these small-scale local shops can be completely replaced by huge shopping malls.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54958677686 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8141466713 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520661157025 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6410111218 50.4703680194 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.307692308 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6153846154 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403877201777 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170260800833 0.0925447433944 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101487531587 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284887079865 0.151781067708 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451467143937 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.