Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
In this age of globalization, study abroad has become a hot option for students. Globalization has made the world smaller, thus enabling overseas education. While some people encourage the same, the others maintain that travelling to study is overrated. Such people advocate the fact that most brilliant scholars have studied locally. I strongly incline to the fact that travelling to study is a better idea. This essay will discuss the advantages of foreign studies.
Firstly, overseas education must be thought of as a boon to students. Travelling to study comes with a package of benefits. Intercontinental studies offer a plethora of opportunities to students. Apart from meeting and adjusting with fellow students from variable corners of the world, they learn new cultures. This inculcates the value of "unity in diversity" among the students.
Secondly, in this era of professionalism, the skills required for an individual to climb up the ladder of career holds mountainous importance. There exists a wide disparity between the skills achieved locally and globally. Foreign degree itself plays a mammoth role in ones' career growth.
By diligently analyzing the above view points, one can undoubtedly state that intercontinental education overweight local education. Hence travelling to study is not overrated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in diversity' among the students. Secondly, in this era of professionalism...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...l education overweight local education. Hence travelling to study is not overrated.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64851485149 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19326885553 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658415841584 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.5024630542 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2112064535 50.4703680194 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.3125 104.977214359 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.625 20.9669160288 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295623196359 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103410054377 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122788876017 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157068824462 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117634114103 0.0609392437508 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.6 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.3980295567 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.