In under developed countries tourism has disadvantages and be said opposite as well.
The importance of tourism in under developed countries which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which I will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that when tourist comes to under developed countries there will be a rise in economy of that country. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that it generates a lot of employment opportunities because there is an establishment of restaurant and hotels. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that tourists are promoting western culture and eventually diminishing their original culture. For instance, British tradition has affected Indian culture several in the present modern era. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of tourist are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, it is potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... of reason which I will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36016949153 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.858543166 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60593220339 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4193086972 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102826793304 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03521779772 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618466232734 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060332529855 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428611405378 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.