working from home using computer
The importance of working from home using computer which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that computer is very helpful for all person’s because provide quickly information to person. Consequently, computer is very useful as people can use it any time. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that working from home using computer any people. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that computer is very helpful for education and business. Besides, computer the technology is developing in numerous countries and is believed to be normal for most office workers in the coming time. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, can reach to a conclusion that the benefits working from home using computer are indeed too a great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Rafia Jawad | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | santhip123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | manraj123 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | gobindh Singh | 86 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16806722689 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71896791566 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563025210084 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8900413267 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382654122755 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146469173539 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179017059512 0.071462118173 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264286471501 0.151781067708 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143249839702 0.0609392437508 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.