Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree
Many artistic fields depend on the government for their development and widespread all over the world. However, it has become the topic of debate in the past few years. Many people opine that funds should be allocated for this field, while others revoke by saying that it will be a waste of money. My opinion, however, coincides with the former notion. This essay will elaborate on the viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that art, music and painting ahs gained wide popularity in the past few decades. As a result, many people are engaging in these sectors to build their careers. Thus, it becomes the responsibility of the government to reserve a certain amount in the budget for these professions. For example, the Australian government has allotted 30% of its budget on these fields in 2017, as a result, the artistic performance of their country increased by ten percent. Therefore, nevertheless, to say, the development of these sectors is as crucial as the other professions.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that music and painting gives a relaxation effect on our minds. Not only has it proved to be an excellent recreational activity but it also helps in gaining fame and money. For instance, many psychological studies have proved that indulging in arts reduces anxiety and depression to a great extent as compared to any other method. Hence, it is quite apparent that the booming of these fields has colossal advantages and therefore, should not be ignored.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that investment in arts and music is indispensable in today’s society and ignorance can cause negative consequences that are too dire to be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97682119205 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86579217513 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546357615894 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8193660282 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130804069657 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358646604352 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315586685715 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07307728911 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114554300526 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.