Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think
The music industry has seen a huge upsurge in the last few years due to technological advancement. There are several apps available on the internet from where we can get the music worldwide. Many people opine that access to online music should be made free, while others revoke that it will reduce its value. My opinion, however, coincides with the latter notion. This essay will elaborate on the viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that composers and singers work hard to produce a song or album. Making it free of cost will put a huge burden on them, as they will not be able to generate the revenue of their work. For example, producing music cost’s a huge sum of money that the composer gets back by selling it to the listeners. Thus, making it available free of cost online can affect the composer financially and also emotionally. Therefore, nevertheless to say it is clear that making online music free will only have a devastating effect on its producers.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that making anything free only reduces its importance as well as value. Not only it will become common very soon but also will lose the interest of the audience. For instance, there are many pirated copies of famous music on the internet which are easily accessible by people, hence they did not stay in the market for long. Also, easily approachable music creates the threat of copyright act. Therefore, it is quite apparent making music free will not generate any fruitful results in our society.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that setting a price for the online music will pay for the hard work of its creators and will also motivate them to compose more enjoyable music in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 320.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.740625 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52626631303 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5391545832 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2352941176 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195624883701 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623397404679 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623406969421 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13094903846 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039339720548 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.