Should government build more roads to allow more vehicles owner or improve the network of public transport?
In last few decades the population around the world has increased dramatically. As a result, numbers of vehicles have also inclined. Some people opine that the government should construct more roads for the automobile owners, while others emphasis on improving the public transport. My opinion, however, coincides with the latter notion. This essay will elaborate on viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is improving the network of public transport can help in relieving the problem of congestion on roads. As a result, people will prefer to travel by public transport than private cars or bikes. As an illustration many people avoid mass transit, because of fewer facilities available. Therefore, it is clear that regime should work on this field than building more roads.
Another pivotal aspect for upholding the statement is that improving the mass commutes like the buses and trains can cut pollution to colossal amount. Not only it will prove beneficial for our surrounding but also reduce the expenses of an individual. For example, a person using a vehicle has to spend lot of money on its maintenance, which can be saved by using a public transport. Hence, it is quite indispensible to upgrade the mass transportation means.
In view of arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that the public transport has abundant advantages which are too great to be ignored. Therefore, the government should take heed in improving it for the wellbeing of our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'public transport'.
Suggestion: public transport
...aintenance, which can be saved by using a public transport. Hence, it is quite indispensible to up...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16015625 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87238491376 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6015625 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4031610148 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29890313918 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773633007545 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926362484128 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167500105459 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561233970201 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.