University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook. Agree or disagree.
textbooks have long been an essential part of university curriculum. People generally held the view that these days universities instead of conitinuously updating the textbooks should adopt electronic media. this essay will discuss the reasons why universities is in fact should use digital media in place of books.
To begin with, digital media is more benificia lthan traditional textbooks in mutiple ways. Firstly, they cover less space. we can, for example, store millions of books in a single computer system. Furthermore, digital media is environment friendly. it does not cause any harm to the natural world. To print textbooks large number of trees were deforested earlier, which is no longer the case nowadays.
Moreover, electronic media is cost efficient than printing of textbooks. To print the new edition of a book earlier the writer needed to spend huge amount on it, which is no longer the case with electronic media as we can update a book without spending even a little bit money. there are, for instance, multiple softwares available for updating the data on a regular basis in free. As a result there is no reason to deny that electronic media is more advantageous than old hard copies of books.
To conclude, this essay discussed how there is no need to upgrade the textbooks in contemporary world. In my opinion, pursuing digital or electronic media is better choice than updating traditional books by spending large amount of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Textbooks
textbooks have long been an essential part of uni...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...extbooks should adopt electronic media. this essay will discuss the reasons why univ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...e ways. Firstly, they cover less space. we can, for example, store millions of boo...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... digital media is environment friendly. it does not cause any harm to the natural ...
^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...n update a book without spending even a little bit money. there are, for instance, multipl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...thout spending even a little bit money. there are, for instance, multiple softwares a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng the data on a regular basis in free. As a result there is no reason to deny tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15481171548 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74547138703 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606694560669 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5754200887 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1333333333 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9333333333 20.9669160288 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211499920863 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741735991791 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548426281499 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138885162544 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401417767063 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 60.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.