“Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
Vegetarianism has become increasingly popular since the 1970s and the ‘animal liberation’ movement. It has also been a part of many cultures around the world, most notably in India. Many people choose to become vegetarians because of ethical reasons. This essay will discuss why being vegetarian is in fact much more ethical than eating meat.
It is well known that meat eating causes enormous suffering to animals. Chickens, cows and pigs, for instance, are raised only to be slaughtered for human consumption. While the level of consciousness of these animals is debatable, there is no doubt that the suffering that they feel is very real. In short, the ethics behind killing animals for human food can never be reconciled.
Vegetarianism also has a positive impact on the environment, which also makes it an ethical stance. Preserving the environment by not eating meat means that everyone will live better lives. Farming cows, for instance, has been shown to negatively affect both pastures and the atmosphere. If we preserve the environment by not eating meat then future generations will live in a much cleaner world, which is highly ethical for us to do.
This essay discussed why vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat because it eliminates unnecessary harm to animals and sustains the environment. In my opinion, vegetarianism is superior to meat eating in terms of ethics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | harshmehta.hm | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | dineshshinde98 | 22 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | ghimirra | 55 | view |
- A competitive environment in school and university would bring excellence and need to be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 72
- Company Top level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decision. How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 77
- Eventually, electric cars will solve all of our transport and environmental issues. Advantage and disadvantages? 77
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 95
- Is increase tourism beneficial or harmful to the local culture ? Give your opinion. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in fact, in short, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2389380531 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96154908212 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592920353982 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3514078022 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.5714285714 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210200301164 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747859130856 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706354821231 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138546412147 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745639864792 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.