Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
Employment is playing a pivotal role in a person's life and assists him financially secure. However, many people argue that occupation should be distinguished based on gender while the proponents want employment to be unbiased. This essay will explain the reasons why the employment is not biased in our contemporary world and will discuss gender biased jobs in certain countries.
One the one hand, both men, and women are competing for each other. Firstly, a majority of the lucrative sectors are having high profiled women CEOs and these sectors are continuing to thrive even during hard times. Moreover, the job market and the organization of developed countries requires both the genders to work together to get the maximum performance from them. For instance, according to recent research by Oxford University, students in the mechanical and the automobile department are developing more perseverance and have the creative mindset when working together with the opposite gender. Therefore, for the success of any job market or industry, both men and women should be treated equally.
On the other hand, few of the developing countries still have male chauvinism. Additionally, women in these countries are restricted to perform certain jobs which are meant to men. To illustrate, in India, a female is not allowed to pursue a career if it relates to operating machinery, and be a tourist guide. Thus, few countries irrespective whether a woman is ready for certain occupation, the country, and the society will not allow her.
In essence, certain occupation is gender biased in countries where there are socio-economic problems and in a developed country there is no such discrimination. In my opinion, any occupation should be open to everyone irrespective of gender and the decision should be left to the individual to pursue the career of their choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ployment is playing a pivotal role in a persons life and assists him financially secure...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25418060201 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94560553782 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56856187291 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2335310352 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124790247967 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435914113544 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037110032938 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672954712882 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488967263677 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.