Is increase tourism beneficial or harmful to the local culture ? Give your opinion.
Tourism in any country is a lucrative business but for developing countries, it provides a plethora of opportunities. However, many argue that tourism is detrimental to the local culture and tradition, while proponents see the merits in it. This essay will explain how tourism is beneficial for the upliftment of local economy and will analyze the reason why it may cause adverse effects.
To begin with, tourism in many countries have paved way for many exciting opportunities for the local community. Firstly, the industry creates new jobs like hotels, restaurants, and tourist guides. Furthermore, the socio-economic status of the country is increased at rapid speed due to the incessant flow of tourist. For instance, the citizens of the country "Maldives" whose revenue solely depends on tourism, has experienced a tenfold increase in their average daily wages after an enormous amount of backpackers started to venture in this small island. As a result, the livelihood of many denizens of the host country is increased.
On the contrary, in some country tourism has negatively influenced the locals. Many third world countries are leveraged by the tourist and the adolescents try to immitate them in terms of dress sense, language and spending amount lavishly on a mrraid of items. For example, a recent research conducted by the University of SASTRA, India has declared many teens and young adults are heavily influenced by the western culture which is a result of high tourism in that country. Thus, tourism can be a burden in some countries.
In essence, tourism has both, its merits and drawbacks. However, in my opinion, cautions need to be exercised by the citizens of the country in preserving their local tradition and also improve their socio-economic status in innovative way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, third, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26989619377 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00802118889 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9947217866 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 7.25397266985 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196673768614 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06465037376 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440057475772 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120091749587 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430082444706 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.