The violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of violent TV program and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of tough regulations on broadcasting violent programs is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of preventing juveniles to watch violent movies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the violent program in television can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of violent activities among the young generation, as well as antisocial behavior are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of unpleasant TV programs on youth. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both moral corruption and civil vandalism apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, prevailing crime by TV programs might increase the consequences of physical violence. Moreover, fundamental aspects of strict rules would relate to this reality that the demerits of abnormal behavior pertain to drug addiction. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of violent TV programs correlated negatively with psychological disorders among the new generation. It is correct to presume the preconceived notion of illegal acts.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of law and regulations in media far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of social norms prove the significance of human behavior, but also pinpoint legal implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61785714286 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20975672993 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4693984704 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116816551241 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038030171894 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360141367848 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062315424375 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318536492649 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.