Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone?
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>People do different
kinds of things to be productive in life. But the topic of ways of being
effective in life always creates debate among people; some people believes that
people can be constructive even though they a routine job while other is of the
opinion that to be constructive people should try different thing. This essay
will further elaborate on this topic. <o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>To begin with, people
can be successful in life by doing the same type of job over and over again. When
people do the same type of job millions of times they become better at that job
and consequently excel in that particular professional field. For example, a
person who has been doing auditing for 10 years will be easily able to detect
any errors in accounts than a person who has recently started doing auditing.
Therefore, doing the routine job can be monotonous and dull but there is no denial
that the people who do this type of job can be successful.<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>On the other hand,
some people cannot be effective when they are doing same type of job. Some
people constantly seek change and thrill in their life to be productive. For
instance, people who like to travel a lot cannot work in a confined space; it
will make them mentally ineffective to complete their assigned job. Ergo, some people
keep changing their work to get a kick out of the life.<o:p></o:p></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>To recapitulate, this
essay discussed the different aspect of the given topic. In my opinion, people
are unique in their own ways what works for one person may not work for other
person.<o:p></o:p></b></p>
People do different kinds of things to be productive in life. But the topic of ways of being effective in life always creates debate among people; some people believes that people can be constructive even though they a routine job while other is of the opinion that to be constructive people should try different thing. This essay will further elaborate on this topic.
To begin with, people can be successful in life by doing the same type of job over and over again. When people do the same type of job millions of times they become better at that job and consequently excel in that particular professional field. For example, a person who has been doing auditing for 10 years will be easily able to detect any errors in accounts than a person who has recently started doing auditing. Therefore, doing the routine job can be monotonous and dull but there is no denial that the people who do this type of job can be successful.
On the other hand, some people cannot be effective when they are doing same type of job. Some people constantly seek change and thrill in their life to be productive. For instance, people who like to travel a lot cannot work in a confined space; it will make them mentally ineffective to complete their assigned job. Ergo, some people keep changing their work to get a kick out of the life.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed the different aspect of the given topic. In my opinion, people are unique in their own ways what works for one person may not work for other person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-16 | nevermind12 | 55 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | nevermind12 | 55 | view |
| 2018-10-05 | omer.cinpir | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | ajayvermaETP | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-24 | ajayvermaETP | 55 | view |
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 55
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 55
- It is argued that getting married before Finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- The way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 85
- Cultural Shock is a new worrying concern for few immigrants. What are the few possible options to eradicate this? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 43, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...
People do different kinds of things to b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 10.5418719212 285% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 6.10837438424 360% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 5.94088669951 370% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 31.9359605911 238% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2784.0 1207.87684729 230% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 545.0 242.827586207 224% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10825688073 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83169070408 3.92707691288 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.88912489949 2.71678728327 143% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.269724770642 0.580463131201 46% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 379.143842365 219% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 12.6551724138 182% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1731110125 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.043478261 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6956521739 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 28.0 4.12807881773 678% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 2.91625615764 343% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22128053367 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976899048738 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058073639431 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787555886264 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691976269466 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.49 8.32886699507 78% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.