what are the different methods students using information. online materials, asking teacher or discussing with classmates.
The importance of different methods students to achieve information through online materials, asking teacher or discussing with classmates which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that online materials very useful for students as they can get knowledge with one click. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that more and more people are relay on online materials because it provides quick information of any topic. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that sometimes student can not able to find the information from online materials so at that time they can ask from their teacher. Besides, sometimes student face difficulties to understand many things they are not able to understand so that time only teacher can help the student. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments, aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of different methods like online materials are indeed to great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19083969466 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70871115762 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572519083969 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.320707024 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.636363636 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225407373554 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730152034309 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946112099592 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130043094851 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319439639241 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.