More information available online.
The importance of using online information available which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that online data are revised. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that we can get a wide range of relevant information about a particular subject. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that library books provide authentic and reliable information. Besides, provide an opportunity for readers engage with full concentration. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to conclusion that the benefits of online information available so library books are useless are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48888888889 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87347683753 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626666666667 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5501737025 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.272727273 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127312024965 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470350953372 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694131204313 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762311345117 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586009513739 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.