What are your views on the tipping system in countries like the USA? Is it necessary to tip the staff?
Many people believe that giving a tip encourages the workers or helpers. At the same time, there are also people who claim that tipping would create a barrier between rich and the poor. Overall, considering all the facts and figures, it is preferred to discuss this topic from multiple angles before drawing any conclusion out if it.
Many communities believe giving a tip as a culture to appreciate someone's work. This is because one gets motivated when his work is appreciated and is rewarded for it. It is seen as an opportunity for reciprocation for your efforts. To keep this enthusiasm of working class, the practice of giving tips is adopted.
On the other hand, we also have people who recommend not to give tips. They come up with two perspectives to explain why it is not good to tip. First one is, the working class is already getting paid in the form their monthly or daily wages. For example, a car driver after dropping his customer is given his charges respectfully. The authorities and government have already considered and fixed an appropriate price for the services offered. So, why should they get paid additionally in the form of tips. Second reason is, the custom of giving tips creates a disparity between giver and taker. It can also be pursued as ‘giver’ feeling superior to ‘taker’. It can be seen as an insult to dignity of labor.
With all the evidences provided above giving tips has its own advantages and disadvantages. I personally think, this act can be abolished from the society, to relieve poor from shackles of being treated bad by rich. There should enough awareness given to help people understand how this will liberate working class to learn to their jobs and themselves. They don't have to live under the mercy of upper or upper middle class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...earn to their jobs and themselves. They dont have to live under the mercy of upper o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 309.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88673139159 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79267962694 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608414239482 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9589162425 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.5 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.25397266985 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106109483622 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368427787058 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467030902922 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719714934796 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280475625717 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.