What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change?
Recently, the phenomenon of combating climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of governments' roles are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that modern companies can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, preventing climate change can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of responsible governments, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of renewable energies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient companies are visible.
From a scientific point of view, significant climate change can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient governments are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described harmful roles. Hence, predicted outcomes of irresponsible persons are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of combating climate change far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of essential companies' roles prove the significance of governments' responsibilities, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93181818182 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35545380656 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659090909091 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9043713616 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245755964797 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755674933705 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574766230652 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140725021182 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592195695948 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.