Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the influence of the building architecture on the people's lives across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In this essay, I shall elaborate the perfectly designed structure inspires to work positively in any course of action to workforce working in the building.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits can be attributed to the design of the building. Firstly, the most conspicuous one is that people working in the well-designed building feel proud and have a positive attitude towards the work. Not only does it contribute to various one's psychological needs, but carefully designed building with the basic needs also empower persons, working in the building, safety which has a profound effect on his mindset. Thus, needless to say, all these associated merits of a building will have a far-reaching positive effect when it comes to one's psychological need.
To embark this, another pivotal facet of the argument is that penetration of natural sources such as air and sunlight in the building can have the tremendous effect on the workforce. Besides, unlike the electric light and air-conditioner air, the maximum touch of natural sources keep away an inevitable diseases which are immensely important for the people; for example, according to a research in "Journal of Architecture", individuals lacking with Vitamin D have increased 40 percent in last two decades due to less exposure to sunlight. Hence it hardly needs to mention that the properly architected structure keep individuals in a preponderant position, as far as the positive energy and health is concerned.
To recapitulate, one can conclude that the design of a building enables people to stay healthy and safe, and merits associated with this are indeed too great to ignore.
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Nowadays fewer people tend to look after their old relatives and send them to some old age homes What is the situation in your country In your opinion who should be responsible to look after the elderly 76
- a groupe of people like to spend money rather save it why they do this what are the avantages and disadvantages 73
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion? 85
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should f
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'disease'?
Suggestion: disease
...natural sources keep away an inevitable diseases which are immensely important for the p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...r the people; for example, according to a research in 'Journal of Architecture',...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...cades due to less exposure to sunlight. Hence it hardly needs to mention that the pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, so, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24252491694 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0622760268 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3253921734 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.8 104.977214359 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 20.9669160288 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297921217871 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114435397778 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789529927643 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164259746196 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717924135272 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.