Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work ?
The new phenomenon of contemporary styles of the modern buildings is highly controversial with many people claiming that these new architectures have a great effect on people. Although some people argue that modern designs have created a hap-hazard living environment, I believe that changes in the structures of the buildings have a positive impact on people. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are several reasons why urban buildings are not suited to people. First and foremost, the mushroomed buildings have no natural greenery and openness to the environment. It is known that people who live in the countryside, where there is access to green spaces are full of life and energy. Secondly, the compact housing has privacy issues as people no longer feel free and live under restriction. Last but not least, these big buildings are more prone to natural calamities like earthquakes and therefore, people are in constant fear.
On the contrary, people who argue on modern buildings coping with urban people balance their argument on their congeniality and convenience. Undoubtedly, the city-dwelling units are more spacious and make use of every corner. Furthermore, the modern layouts have spaces for separate servant room, garage, study room for children and common community parks to interact with people. For this reason, people feel safe and secure in such buildings and that make them balanced in their work life.
This essay discussed the modern-day architecture and its proximity to nature and how they keep people away from stress. In my opinion, the city housing offers a happy experience to the people and cater to the needs of the existing world
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-01 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-01 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibilty of producers to avoid over packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience. 77
- In the past 100 years, there are many inventions like antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important invention for the past 100 years? Why? 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this ?. Discuss with appropriate examples. 80
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. What is your opinion? 80
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid over-packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example of your own experience. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73180405275 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1208450433 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.571428571 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286009971149 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886459144235 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682813073605 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157833372446 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777800137316 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.