Whether studying films at school is as important as studing literature?
There is a colossal upsurge in today’s world towards teaching arts, films, and dramas alongside other important subjects and literature. Some believe that it carries a significant number of benefits while others argue that it erodes the mind of young people at a very young age. This essay will cover different aspects of the topic and conclude with examples.
Films, music, and arts play a crucial role in developing some skills in students at a young age. They increase the creativity level of the students, and build the capability of approaching a problem in different ways, and provide an out of the box solution. A recent study shows that films taught at a younger age tend to make pupils more creative. But, a lot of attention is required as it carries a lot of negative consequences associated with it.
Although teaching films at schools has its own benefits but its demerits cannot be ignored at the same time. The content of such play can also play an important role in destroying young minds. Furthermore, at school age, there should be more focus on building the literature skills as well as the studies of the modern sciences and technologies, which will help students to build their careers and professional lives. Because studies show that demand for the technology related workforce is on the rise. Hence, teaching other literature subjects is more important than films at a young age.
To conclude, although films play an important part in creating some skills yet they should be taught at higher levels when students get matured. Instead, more focus is required in building the literature and technology related studies at the school level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | Basil3241 | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | mndpsngh21 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | sajid.uett | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | chetan03sharma | 86 | view |
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 80
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. Discuss it. 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Benefits and problems of studying and work related to old theatre play in high schools. Give your opinion with examples. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67002445466 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546762589928 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9788011459 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298437217125 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10300760032 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897539078009 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190202916535 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111671475973 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.