The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The line graph compares the variation in levels in different months in terms of promotion of the values of contract by month for four types of mobile in a European country between January and September 2002, measured in euros.
In general, the promotion of different cell phones fluctuated from the beginning to the middle of the year. Moreover, while Domo and Sim TX witnessed a downward trend, Lex and Alpha tend to grow up to the end of the period.
To begin with, Domo and Alpha get the highest points and opposites above 15% and 5%, respectively. This has slightly increased in the first month. For a while, the percentage of Lex and Sim TX gradually went down from January to February. It steadily rose to reach a peak of 14% in Sim TX and 13% in Lex in June. Beside that, while Alpha's percentage stayed constant, Domo increased significantly to around 25%.
Continuing to the rest of the period, there was a huge change in the promotion in Alpha and Lex when both of them significantly surged to reach a peak of 25% and 18%, respectively. However, the percentage of Sim TX plunged to the lowest point, approximately 8% at the end.
- The graph below shows the proportion of types of magazines sold by the company in 1975 1995 and 2015 78
- The line graph compares the percentage of people living in four Asian counties in the world between 1970 and 2040
- The line graph compares the percentage of people living in four Asian counties in the world between 1970 and 2040
- The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016 67
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d September 2002, measured in euros. In general, the promotion of different c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67647058824 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72042483169 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6657829899 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195867748663 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715630416745 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120072289929 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136965845288 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151829907554 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d September 2002, measured in euros. In general, the promotion of different c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67647058824 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72042483169 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6657829899 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195867748663 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715630416745 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120072289929 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136965845288 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151829907554 0.0819641961636 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.