You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
All large companies should provide sports and community facilities to the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
The hot debated issue whether all large coporations equipped local community with sports and community facilities or not is still controversial. This essay will delve into explaining the reasons why I agree with first point of view
First of all, large firms should invest in the infrastructure of the local communities for the sake of its own benefits. It is obvious that most of the citizens in the areas where the companies locate are somehow their employees. Only when their standard of living such as healthcare service, school for their children, transportation systems, recreation centres and shopping malls are built, will they pay full attention to their work. They, therefore, work more productively and gain more profits their companies. As a result, the owners of the coporations will be richer and richer.
In addition, the mamagers should focus on improving their workers's and the inhabitans in the neighborhood's health by setting up more and more sports centres or organizing mor sports club. They can support all these places by providing some sports facilities. It cannot be denied that, in the development of advanced technology, with the help of smart devices, people no longer do manual job so hard. Moreover, they tend to sil all day in front of the computer screen without much physical activities. Under work pressure and a hetic schedule make them have no spare time for doing work-out. If there is a sport centre or just a gym near their work place, this will boost them to practice physical exercise. As their healh improves, they will have more energy to work, whiich is proved their working products will be more efficient.
In conclusion, with all above explanation, I am of the opinion that equipping sports and community facilities to the local area should be partly the responsibility of large firms not only for the community's sake but also their own benefit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-07 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- The maps show how the industrial area will change into a housing area in the future 84
- Pop stars earn much more than classical music performers Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
- The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...l delve into explaining the reasons why I agree with first point of view First o...
^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'neighborhoods'' or 'neighborhood's'?
Suggestion: neighborhoods'; neighborhood's
...heir workerss and the inhabitans in the neighborhoods health by setting up more and more spor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...conclusion, with all above explanation, I am of the opinion that equipping sports...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04458598726 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75072969492 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.722121389 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205254378596 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731653386873 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834850510892 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164100833043 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07586803041 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.