Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Nowadays, the significance of over packaging has sparked a public controversy, which leads to a moot question “Which one, consumers, or the producer should avoid extra packaged products?”. While there are persuasive arguments in favor of consumers’ role in avoiding excess packaging, I believe entirely with the idea that manufacturers are of paramount importance to society.
From a social perspective, over packaging is strongly related to consumers’ tendency, which means it might lead to both eye-catching design and colored packet. For example, a group of reputable scientists, working at a highly prestigious university, conducted a qualitative study to understand the relationship between plastic packaging and environmental damage as well as extra cost. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that a satisfied consumer is positively correlated with not only a fair price but also the foil-wrapper.
Moreover, I believe that extra packaging is attributable to the manufacturer, in that it would lead to a popular brand, mass production, and a competitive market. A well-known example of such attributions is food shopping, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking row material for granted. Thus, excess packaging could play a significant role in economic prosperity, international trade, and environmental issue.
In conclusion, attractive packaging can be mutually beneficial under different circumstances. However, I completely agree that packaging boom not only will prove to be worthwhile but also crucial to society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Law can change human's behavior, do you agree or disagree? 85
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such asenvironmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 88
- In most education system, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is good idea or not? 88
- the law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85531914894 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50209405118 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672340425532 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5851007515 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.6 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254373784475 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879508645588 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077402655616 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143672228794 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955573595805 0.0609392437508 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.