Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the avoiding of the over packed products has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should consumer avoid ovor packed products?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the producer is responsible of avoiding extra packaging of products, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, product packaging is bound up inextricably with producer, which indicates they lead to both good packaging and colored packaging. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between consumer products and business partner as well as an exponential increase in market demands. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of making money is correlated positively with not only goods price but also company profit.
Within the realm of retailers, without the slightest doubt, online shopping attribute to electronic equipment, in that it would come down to internet access, stores, and shopping center. A salient example of such attribution is black market, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take packed products for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint extra packaging problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to advertisement, foil packaging, and even industrial polution. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of customers, product consumer, and government.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that consumer must be remain responsible for this challenge. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 77
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 88
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change. 11
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 19, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7785467128 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11172913399 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681660899654 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3348659072 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.461538462 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271055415146 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759063397562 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885105602994 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158909047803 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12964634421 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.