Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of prevention of extra pakaging has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the matter of thorny issues is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, advertisments are bound up inextricably with consumer attraction, which indicates they lead to vital issues. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2017 demonstrates the relationship between this unique phenomenon and total outcomes as well as an exponential increase in academic debates. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of responsible manufactring is correlated positively with consumerism.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, ocean and land polution attribute to plastic packagings, in that it would come down to critical issues. A salient example of such attribution is complex procedures which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take pragmatic approaches for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opprotunity to pinpoint current policy problems.Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of environmentally friendly methods.
To conclude, as for myself, after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe avoiding extra packages is of high importance. However, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...ity to pinpoint current policy problems.Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.825 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32569698209 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.720833333333 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.816962093 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.090909091 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941444007436 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295103932439 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377847349417 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514272910385 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277523656058 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.52 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.