The population of metropolis has witnessed a sharp increase in recent decades in most parts of the world. However, those who live in the mega cities encounter many problems that as the cities grow. This essay will outline some of these issues and discuss whether governments should encourage people to live in smaller towns.
One of the most notorious problems in metropolis is the long-hour commute. Most commuters find it exhausting to travel over one hour per day either by cramming subway or by car jamming in the traffic, but they have to endure it because affordable housing is usually far away from the city centre. Another common problem city dwellers might encounter is high cost of living. Aside from the higher cost of accommodation, there are many other kinds of spending including parking fee, strata. It is reported that International cities, such as Hong Kong and London, generally require the highest living cost in the world. Furthermore, metropolitans are reported to be under a higher level of stress because of high tempo lifestyle and more financial pressure.
However, despite all the problems aforementioned, governments should not encourage to move to small towns because of several reasons. Firstly, people choose to move to some areas mostly because there are better opportunities. When they find better jobs in big cities, their life standard will generally increase, and vice versa. Therefore, it is not the governments' role to tell people where to live. Moreover, there are many benefits that small town residents do not have. For example, metropolitans can watch live events such as sport game or concert frequently because there are many of them available, whereas people in small town need to travel long distance and stay overnight. Therefore, it is hard to persuade those who enjoy city life to move out.
In conclusion, although there are some shortcomings of living in large cities, governments bear no right to discourage people to move to smaller cities because it is people's choice and it is undeniable that they are entitled to the resources in big towns.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. 84
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'moving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: moving
...ioned, governments should not encourage to move to small towns because of several reaso...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...nd vice versa. Therefore, it is not the governments role to tell people where to live. More...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11918604651 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72294045947 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3094427419 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.588235294 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35499441477 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103776557072 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10364560236 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229553049204 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990527991906 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.