Railway system and road system have been two of the main infrastructure for transportation. Some people argue that governments should allocate expenditure to railways instead of roads. However, I partially disagree with this opinion for the following reasons.
Undoubtedly, there are many advantages that railways have. The most obvious one is the larger amount of passenger trains or subways can carry. In contrast, most cars running on the street even during rush hours do not have the maximum passengers and thus roads cannot commute as many passengers as railways do. Moreover, trains and subways are more environmental friendly than cars. The modern trains and subways are all powered by electricity, while a majority of cars still rely on fuel. Thus, having more railways can alleviate air pollution and ultimately alleviate global warming. Last but not least, trains and subways are usually more efficient in city centre and long-distance commute. For example, people opt to public transports such as trams and trains to go to city because it saves the hassle to find parking and avoids traffic jam. Likewise, people prefer taking high-speed train when available as it is faster than driving on highway and less tiring.
In spite of the benefits mentioned above, there are still many reasons in favour of funding for roads. Firstly, roads are more accessible. When trucks deliver goods from train stations or ports to shops or homes, roads provide route to the doorstep. In addition, road users enjoy more freedom than public transports users because they can travel whenever they want without worrying the timetable. Furthermore, funding road construction and maintenance is less expensive than the railway counterpart. This is significant factor for rural areas where local governments do not have enough money to support public transport system.
To conclude, since railways and roads have different pros and cons, I partial disagree that governments should only spend money on railway. Governments should base on different situation to allocate the funding proportionately.
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
...lic transports such as trams and trains to go to city because it saves the hassle to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42944785276 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7633116821 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592024539877 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5846481696 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159998651087 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501726186503 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448659448399 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118092808701 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419272124424 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.