1
In today's modern world, with advanced and complicate circumtances, many recent and useful skills are becoming important more than ever before. with this in mind, there is no doubt that speaking ability effects students' life in variouse ways. One controversial question arises in this regard, weather public speaking should be a requirment for students or not. In my perspective, its vital to students in upper level to can talk infront of many people. I feel this way for some reasons which are pinpointed in te following.
To begin with, human beings begins to speake from first age of life according to have cominication with others. This ability progresses in all the people as they are become mature. On the other hand, how to speak and what to say plays an increseangly pivotal role on others reactions. Therefore, improving this skill is significant for students who should overcome lofs of difficulties in their entire life. In other words, its crystal clear that students as intelligent members of every societis, should deal with explain or express their ideas to others specialy in university. To illustrate my point, during the semasters professors assign many research and conferences for students that should be prepared for them. As a result, to pass a requirment course about how to apeak in public benefit them.
Additonaly, many students after graduating from university will seek for finding proper job. Employers evalute valountiers to find profecinals. In this situations, young people who has more confident and ability to talk formal have more opportunuties to find appropiate job. To pass cources that teach them to speak in public and formal will result in better situation to find job and offcourse promote sooner. For instance, in company that i'm working, there are some meetings that all of us should explain our duties and tasks. Which requires to speak in public. Study relative lessons at universuty can lead to sucsseful spaech in this situatuions.
In a nutshell, by taking account all the abow reasons and many others, i strongely believe that speaking in public requiments is neccessary for students since benefit them in confronces and jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | cogax13515 | view | |
| 2023-06-24 | Leeinho | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | Leeinho | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | ayaitch1elt | 95 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...coming important more than ever before. with this in mind, there is no doubt that sp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ute valountiers to find profecinals. In this situations, young people who has more c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...us should explain our duties and tasks. Which requires to speak in public. Study rela...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'speaking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: speaking
...in our duties and tasks. Which requires to speak in public. Study relative lessons at un...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i feel, no doubt, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18079096045 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74476278554 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587570621469 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0106564005 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.