Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
The interaction between people has changed recently because of the advancement of technology. There are number of ways that technology has affected human relationships and this change should be considered as a positive development on the aspect of society.
Technology has affected the types of relationships which humans make in numerous ways. To begin, there are many human interactions through intenet. This means that majority of people have online relationships. For instance, some individual has thousands of facebook friends and rich social network to cope with in difficult situations. The improvement of communication brings the world together and as a result of this people have highly sophisticated online apps for connections. Viber, Whatsapp, Imo and messenger are the best examples for these. To keep in touch with a friend or relative in another continent is no longer a matter to consider, if someone had access to internet as well as having a business meeting or an interview via skype.
This development can be regarded as positive, because it enhances the chances and quality of human interactions. When considering the situation two decades ago, there were only poor number of ways to contact with each other. However, people live in twenty first century has better connections compared to the past. They have easy access to new relationships and able to maintain existing ones. Though there are some decline in the real social life, people enjoy social networking via online.
Personal relationships and interactions between people has changed due to development in technology these days. This is a positive development in my opinion because it has brought the world a global village.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of adult people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people believe that the most important aspect of their job is their salary Others think that the job itself is the most important What do you think is the most important aspect of a job Include specific details and example to support your choice 86
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s the world together and as a result of this people have highly sophisticated online...
^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...ith each other. However, people live in twenty first century has better connections compared...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...r. However, people live in twenty first century has better connections compared to the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35925925926 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99473932903 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9060732154 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4375 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395932597152 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114225634647 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869790629949 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258566338118 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946209202504 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.